As we speak a hardy group of individuals have decided that enough is enough, and with cries of anger have managed the unimaginable: they have pitched pup tents on the lawn outside if the Vancouver Art Gallery!
Wow, I’m sure that Jimmy Pattison and Warren Buffett are on the phone right now saying “Oh my God! What shall we do!”
Here’s a clue: if the police and army aren’t actively smashing heads and hauling you off in chains, then you aren’t threatening anyone.
The Occupy Vancouver crew actually went so far as to meet the Vancouver Police, and with the Downtown Business Association when they were organizing the event. They have set up camp in an generally sanctioned location for protests – one that usually doesn’t actually inconvenience anyone – and seem to be acting in a polite and law abiding manner. Certainly no-one is pounding tent stakes into the lawn.
Let’s be blunt. As long as the various Occupy groups stay within approved boundaries of geography and behavior, they’ll likely be left more or less alone. Heck, even Canada’s Finance minister, a right wing reactionary if ever there was one, spoke approvingly of them.
Or, to be equally blunt, the 99% that are behind these actions pose no threat whatsoever to the 1% that own and control our governments and corporations.
OWS can certainly claim the moral high ground, but the people with real power and money feel no need to join them there, and will happily carry on polluting, destroying, corrupting, and robbing the rest of us.
Remember the sixties and seventies, and the peace marches in Vancouver that approached 100,000 people? Canada is still building arms, and sending young men and women to fight in foreign wars – usually at the behest of the Americans.
Remember the seventies and eighties, and the growing environmental movement? Companies like BP are still polluting, and Canada’s role in the tar sands continues to be an international embarrassment.
Remember the fight for women’s rights and equality? Guess who’s still making 69%?
What the greedheads have figured out is that they can a) choose to ignore any and all protests, or b) put their money into barefaced misleading advertising campaigns, or if really embarrassed can c) express their deep and abiding concern for the cause of the day, then return to a).
Non-violence has a lovely ring to it, and those not in power are always quick to embrace it. The problem is that the power brokers don’t and ultimately you’ll wind up on the receiving end of truncheon or a tank.
Besides, let’s not forget that while Martin Luther King Jr was preaching non-violence there were also groups like the Black Panthers and the Weather Underground who were taking a decidedly more direct approach to change. Can you honestly say that fear of that kind of radical violent movement didn’t play a big role in the changes that came out of the Civil Rights Movement? Can you believe that major riots in cities across the US didn’t scare the bezeejuz out of the political leaders?
If you’re genuinely hoping to bring and end to the exploitation that comes from Capitalism, you’ll need to bring the entire Empire to its knees.
You will not do that with protest signs, or encampments, or Twitter feeds.
You do it the same way that many of the Middle East protests did it: by making it abundantly clear that if change doesn’t happen – now – then you’ll rise up and make things change.
As one person described such things to me, it’s not enough to complain, or even to threaten. You also need to be able to say “Or else we will do this.” You need to be able to look your oppressor in the eye and say “Make these changes, or there will be consequences, big ones.”
So far no-one in the Occupy movement has done that. Camping out at the Gallery is cute, but will do nothing to change anything.